Requirments for articles

REQUIRMENTS FOR ARTICLES

Basic conditions
1. Requirements for the text
2. Required manuscript structure
3. Sections of the article: Recommendation
4. Requirements for registration information about the authors
5. Before submitting a manuscript to the editorial office, authors are requested to check themselves using the checklist
Reviewing
Package of documents for the article

Basic conditions

The manuscript can be sent to the editorial office of the journal only if the following conditions are met:

the research was conducted with the highest standards of care and conscientiousness;
the manuscript is original and has not been published anywhere else, including by the authors of the manuscript;
the work has not been submitted anywhere else and is not reviewed with any other publication;
the work does not contain defamatory, discreditable or illegal statements;
allowed to use any third-party materials;
confirmation of consent has been obtained from all specified persons or organizations;
authorship was agreed prior to submission, and no one was “gifted” with authorship or refused to be credited as an author (ghostly authorship).
the author(s) has/have read and agrees to the General Terms and Conditions of the Terms of Publication.

If your research is published and we find that any of these conditions have not been met, we may take action in accordance with COPE guidelines, which may result in one of the correction notices, or we may remove or revoke the article.

Additions and additional materials

If there are figures in the article, the authors must choose the main figure that reflects the results obtained. This figure will be placed at the title of the article in the archive of the journal.
Drawing requirements:

format .jpg, .jpeg, .png
resolution not less than 300 dpi
size no more than 5 Mb

Also, electronic additional materials for the article at the request of the authors (Excel files, audio and video files) can be published.

Requirements for the text

Font – Times New Roman
Font size – 14
Interval – 1
Margins of the document – 20 mm
Number of pages – min 12
Article language: English.
Ukrainian authors can submit their manuscripts for consideration in both English and Ukrainian. After acceptance of the article by the reviewers, authors of Ukrainian articles are given time to translate the article into English or can use the translation service provided by the editorial office.

Required manuscript structure

UDC for articles of technical and economic sciences

JEL Classification for economic science articles only

Title of the article in English

First name Last name in English

Summary

Keywords

Introduction
Material and Method
Results and Discussion
Conclusions

Acknowledgments (optional)

Conflict of interest

It is necessary to indicate the absence or presence of a conflict of interest. If there is a conflict of interest, it must be specified.
When there is no conflict of interest, it is necessary to specify the phrase:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this research, whether financial, personal, authorship or otherwise, that could affect the research and its results presented in this paper.

Financing

Sources of funding must be indicated. If there is no funding, it is necessary to indicate:
The study was performed without financial support.

Data availability

Choose one of the options and indicate it in the text of the manuscript:

manuscript has associated data in a data repository
manuscript has data included as electronic supplementary material
data will be made available on reasonable request
data cannot be made available for reasons disclosed in the data availability statement
manuscript has no associated data

Use of artificial intelligence

Choose one of the options and indicate it in the text of the manuscript:

If AI was not used, indicate the phrase: The authors confirm that they did not use artificial intelligence technologies in creating the submitted work.
If AI was used, it must be declared in accordance with the editorial policy according to the scheme:
– model and number of AI,
– where exactly it was used (in which section of the article),
– what exactly was done using AI tools (specific description),
– how the authors checked the results provided by AI tools,
– how the result provided by the AI tool influenced the conclusions of the study.

Authors' contributions

Indicate the author's contribution according to CRediT (Author Role Taxonomy) in the format:
Author1 first name last name: contribution1, contribution2, contribution3; Author2 first name last name: contribution1, contribution2, contribution3

References (at least 10 sources of literature)

The percentage of self-citation should not exceed 30% (i.e. if you used 10 references, no more than 3 of them can be to your work)

Sections of the article: Recommendation

Sections of the article	Recommendation
Summary	The Summary must contain 1800–1900 characters and should be based on the following scheme: Object of research. The problem to be solved. The essence of the results. What explains these results. Under what conditions they can be used in practice.
Keywords	Keywords should be informative in terms of the possibility of identifying this article by search and indexing resources.
1. Introduction	The Introduction should be based on the following scheme: Relevance rationales are arguments that scientific research on a given topic is important for modernity and that the results of such research are important for practice. A critical analysis of the literature should point to an existing problem that has not yet been resolved. From this analysis, the need for the purpose of the author's research should follow. At the end of this section of the article, it is necessary to formulate the aim of the study. The formulation of the aim consists of two parts: scientific and practical. The scientific part includes what indicates a solution to the problem: identifying some regularities, identifying the influence of something on something, identifying the mechanism of such and such a process, developing a model (method, etc.), developing application techniques such and such methods for ... etc. The practical part includes what indicates the expectations from the practical use of the results for example: This will make it possible to…
2. Materials and methods	In this section, it is necessary to say about object of research and about how the research was carried out: equipment, software (if used), theoretical methods, experimental conditions. That is, this section talks about how exactly the results were obtained. No need to report results.
3. Results and Discussion	Results are given in the form of figures, tables, final formulas. Discussion should include: Interpretation of the results (what explains the results?) What is their difference from those known from the literature or from practical experience? Practical relevance. It is necessary to indicate exactly how the results obtained during the study can be applied in practice. The scope of application is not limited and independently distinguished by authors based on the characteristics of the study. Research limitations. A limitation is something that, in the conditions of conducting your research, is an objective reality that affects the results obtained. The impact of martial law conditions. It is necessary to indicate exactly how the conditions of martial law in Ukraine influenced the conduct of the study and/or the results obtained. These may be certain restrictions, the impact of changes in the education system, legislative changes, changes in learning conditions (distance education), etc. For authors from other countries, this item is not mandatory but can be indicated if similar conditions are present in the country where the study was conducted. Prospects for further research.
4. Conclusion	Conclusions should contain the following information: What are the results obtained (brief essence)? What explains these results (brief interpretation)? How can these results be useful (theoretically and/or practically)? Quantitative evaluations of results and/or comparative evaluations are desirable if available.

Requirements for registration information about the authors

For each author

First name, Last name

Corresponding author

Science degree, Job title

Department (Laboratory, etc.)

University/Work

Work address (university, etc.)

E-mail: ….

Phone: ….

ORCID: ….

First name, Last name

Science degree, Job title

Department (Laboratory, etc.)

University/Work

Work address (university, etc.)

E-mail: ….

Phone: ….

ORCID: ….

Before submitting a manuscript to the editorial office, authors are requested to check themselves using the checklist.

Download checklist

REVIEWING*

Deadline 30–40 days

Once you submit your article, it will be sent for review. Our editorial staff is practicing a double-blind peer review

*Review procedure involves checking for plagiarism, verification of compliance the article title and content, check the content of the article (more details).

Get response from reviewers. If there are corrections, it is necessary to take into account all the comments of the reviewers and send the revised article back by e-mail to tapr@entc.com.ua, tarp.nauka@gmail.com.
If there are no corrections or all the remarks made by the reviewers are corrected, the article will be accepted for publication in the journal based on the results of double-blind review.

PACKAGE OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE ARTICLE

is submitted by the authors to the editorial board after the first stage of verification – compliance of the submitted manuscript with the subject of the journal and verification of the uniqueness of the text (More details...)

+380 (57) 7508990