UDC
JEL Classification

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE  IN ENGLISH

First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name….  in English

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE  IN UKRAINIAN (Translation for English-speaking authors in Ukrainian is made by editorial office)

First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name….  in Ukrainian

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE  IN RUSSIAN (Translation for English-speaking authors in Russian is made by editorial office)

First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name…. in Russian

Abstract of the article (in minimum 250 words) in English suggests the following semantic units:

• the name of the object of research and identified its main disadvantages during the audit;
• description of the approach (methods, techniques, etc...), which allowed (or allowing in the future) to remove data (some) disadvantages;
• the result (in quantitative or qualitative terms) with the name of the essence of the identified reserves of operation/function, etc. of the object;

• a brief author's interpretation of the results (an explanation what allow to achieve the effect).

Keywords in English (10–12 words)

Abstract in Ukrainian (in minimum 250 words)

Keywords in Ukrainian (10–12 words)(Translation for English-speaking authors in Ukrainian is made by editorial office)

Abstract in Russian (in minimum 250 words)

Keywords in Russian (10–12 words)
(Translation for English-speaking authors in Russian is made by editorial office)

1. Introduction

The section should contain a justification for the relevance of research, confirmed by the most significant, according to the authors, published works in the same field (at the level of references, avoiding mentioning the names of scientists). It is important that these references can be verified, i.e., relevant works can be found in some resources. A detailed literature review should be avoided. References to the text should be arranged as follows [1, 2]. (No more than 3 sources may be mentioned in one sentence).

Based on reasonable relevance, indicate the object and aim of research.

2. Methods of research

«Methods of research» section should include a description of the methods, techniques, approaches, and so on, which were involved in research.

3. Research results and discussion

In «Research results» section authors should give authors the research results (using graphic and tabular material sufficient for an understanding) with an emphasis on what the result has been received (in quantitative or qualitative terms), or are expected in the implementation of the proposed ideas of the author. The result must be accompanied by the author's interpretation – the answer to the question of how the results can be explained.

4. Conclusions

In this section, the results must correspond to the objectives of the «The aim and objectives of research» section. Appropriate solution must describe for each of the objectives in the course of research.

Acknowledgements (if any)

The purpose of this section is an opportunity to thank all the people who contributed to the research, but do not qualify for authorship.
This section is optional and is added at the request of the author.

References to the АРА standard.

• It does not contain abbreviations
• Strictly correspond to the content of article

• In minimum 250 words
• It does not contain abbreviations that are understandable only from the context of article

• 10–12 words
• Do not contain abbreviations that are understandable only from the context of article
• Separated by commas

• Before a figure, there must be a reference to the figure in the form: Fig. 1, Fig.2‒4, Fig. 5, a. Before a figure, there should be a link to the figure (in the same chapter/subsection as the figure itself)
• The caption under a figure should take the form: Fig. 1. The title of the figure.
• If the figure consists of several subfigures, the caption should take the form:

Fig. 1. The title of the figure: a ‒ the name of the first subfigure; b ‒ the name of the second subfigure...

• If there are designations, abbreviations, or abbreviations in the figure, the transcript of which were not given earlier in the text, then those should be explained in the text under the figure. For example, the figure shows three charts, which are marked, respectively, by numbers 1, 2, and 3. Then the text under the figure should take the form:

Fig. 1. Title: 1 ‒ chart 1; b ‒ chart 2; 3 ‒ chart 3

• Text under the figure must be part of the text.
• Figures should be streamlined "in text."
• The inscriptions in the figure should not be bold or sloping.
• All inscriptions in the figure must be written in one font and one size. The exception is screenshots of programs that do not allow one to edit the font.
• The indices in the figure should take the same form as the indices in the text.
• On the charts, the axes' titles must be moved from the scales to the same distance of at least 0.5 cm.
• At least one size (height or width) in the text under the figure should be the same. The horizontally located subfigures should have the same height, and the vertically located ones should have the same width.

• Figures must be of good quality (at least 300 dpi). The inscriptions on the figures should be clear and readable, the lines of the figure should not be blurred. There should be no noise in the figure.

• The editorial board reserves the right to reject a paper if the authors refuse to provide the original figure files to avoid data falsification (dwg ‒ for COMPAS drawings; SolidWorks, AutoCad, cdr. ‒ for CorelDRAW files; xls/xlsx ‒ for Excel, etc.).

• Header table does not contain blank cells
• If your document table is divided into several pages, re-do the signature on a new page does not need to!
• All tables should be vertical

• Formulas should be typed in the MathType equation editor
• Links to the formula in the text are (1), (2)–(4)
• Formulas should be numbered
• Numbering alignment to the right
• The formula is part of the text, so after a claim must stand semantic mark if the new proposal goes further, then the point, if further clarification is the comma

• References should take the form [1], [2, 3]
• References should be in the order of their mention in the article
• All literature references cited in the Literature part, reference should be in the text necessarily!

• References in a language articles, translated into English
• References must be completed according to the АРА standard
• Sources must be at least 10
• The list of references should be at least 6 on foreign sources
• The list of links inadmissible use national standards
• The percentage of self-citations – no more than 20 % (i.e., if you used the 10 links, only 2 of them can to your works)

• Full name
• Rank, position
• Department
• University
• University address
• E-mail
• Contact phone
• Number of publications in Ukrainian editions (approximate)
• Number of publications in international journals indexed (approximate)
• H-index by Scopus (if available)
• Number of ORCID

The author's ORCID ID is required. ORCID provides a unique and persistent digital identifier that distinguishes researchers from every other researcher, even those who share the same name, and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between researchers and their professional activities, ensuring that their work is recognized.

Deadline 30–40 days

1. Once you submit your article, it will be sent for review. Our editorial staff is practicing a double-blind peer review

*Review procedure involves checking for plagiarism, verification of compliance the article title and content, check the content of the article (more detail).

2. Get response from reviewers. If adjustment is then necessary to take them into account, and return an e-mail.
3. If no adjustments or fixed all the comments made by the reviewers, the article goes on editing.

Only those manuscripts that meet the standards of the journal, and fit within its aims and scope, will be sent to expert reviewers.

Deadline 3–14 days

1. Editing procedure involves checking articles on formal grounds, according to the correctness of the requirements.
2. Get the answer from the editors of the journal. If there are adjustments that need to take them into account and send the article back by email.
3. If no adjustments or fixed all the comments made by the editor, you will need to prepare a package of documents.