UDC
JEL Classification

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE  IN ENGLISH

First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name….  in English

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE  IN UKRAINIAN (Translation for English-speaking authors in Ukrainian is made by editorial office)

First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name….  in Ukrainian

Abstract of the article (in minimum 250 words) in English suggests the following semantic units:

• the name of the object of research and identified its main disadvantages during the audit;
• description of the approach (methods, techniques, etc...), which allowed (or allowing in the future) to remove data (some) disadvantages;
• the result (in quantitative or qualitative terms) with the name of the essence of the identified reserves of operation/function, etc. of the object;

• a brief author's interpretation of the results (an explanation what allow to achieve the effect).

Keywords in English (10–12 words)

Abstract in Ukrainian (in minimum 250 words)

Keywords in Ukrainian (10–12 words)(Translation for English-speaking authors in Ukrainian is made by editorial office)

1. Introduction

«Introduction» section should provide the reader who does not own issues freely, with all the necessary background information to make it clear the relevance of scientific research.

2. The object of research and its technological audit

«The object of research and its technological audit» section should contain a detailed description of the examined object.

At the end of this section you need to describe the specific disadvantages that are inherent in this object in the existing conditions of use/operation.

3. The aim and objectives of research

In «The aim and objectives of research» section on the basis of the identified disadvantages of the research object it is necessary to formulate the aim and objectives of the research, by which this objective can be achieved.

4. Research of existing solutions of the problem

In this section, an analysis of existing ways of overcoming the disadvantages of the given object (a minimum of 10 sources) should be conducted. On the basis of this section, the reader (scientist, industrialist, manager) should form an idea of the existing operational experience / operation / maintenance, and so on of the object and inherent experience of eliminating real disadvantages. The number of foreign scientific periodicals sources must be at least 70 % of all used sources. (Note: the names of the authors of the used sources in the text are not mentioned, links to their works is sufficient in the text).

5. Methods of research

«Methods of research» section should include a description of the methods, techniques, approaches, and so on, which were involved in research.

6. Research results

In «Research results» section authors should give authors the research results (using graphic and tabular material sufficient for an understanding) with an emphasis on what the result has been received (in quantitative or qualitative terms), or are expected in the implementation of the proposed ideas of the author. The result must be accompanied by the author's interpretation – the answer to the question of how the results can be explained.

7. SWOT analysis of research results

In this section, you need to specify:
− Strengths – the positive effect of the research object on its internal factors (e. g. increase efficiency of equipment leads to increased productivity and economic use of the calculation of the parameter contributes to the reduction of cash costs).
− Weaknesses – the negative effect of the research object on its internal factors (e. g., high energy costs and the complexity of calculation).
− Opportunities – prospects for further research (for example, to explore possible solutions to the problem of high energy consumption and the possibility of economic calculation of the parameter estimates for other economic variables).
− Threats – a negative effect of external factors on the object of research (such as the presence of foreign analogue equipment with better parameters or changing laws regarding the economic sphere of domestic production).

8. Conclusions

In this section, the results must correspond to the objectives of the section «The aim and objectives of research». Appropriate solution must describe for each of the objectives in the course of research.

Conflict of interest
It is necessary to indicate the absence or presence of a conflict of interest. If there is a conflict of interest, it must be specified.
When there is no conflict of interest, it is necessary to specify the phrase:

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this research, whether financial, personal, authorship or otherwise, that could affect the research and its results presented in this paper.


Acknowledgements (if any)

The purpose of this section is an opportunity to thank all the people who contributed to the research, but do not qualify for authorship.
This section is optional and is added at the request of the author.

References to the АРА standard.

• It does not contain abbreviations
• Strictly correspond to the content of article

• In minimum 250 words
• It does not contain abbreviations that are understandable only from the context of article

• 10–12 words
• Do not contain abbreviations that are understandable only from the context of article
• Separated by commas

• Before a figure, there must be a reference to the figure in the form: Fig. 1, Fig.2‒4, Fig. 5, a. Before a figure, there should be a link to the figure (in the same chapter/subsection as the figure itself)
• The caption under a figure should take the form: Fig. 1. The title of the figure.
• If the figure consists of several subfigures, the caption should take the form:

Fig. 1. The title of the figure: a ‒ the name of the first subfigure; b ‒ the name of the second subfigure...

• If there are designations, abbreviations, or abbreviations in the figure, the transcript of which were not given earlier in the text, then those should be explained in the text under the figure. For example, the figure shows three charts, which are marked, respectively, by numbers 1, 2, and 3. Then the text under the figure should take the form:

Fig. 1. Title: 1 ‒ chart 1; b ‒ chart 2; 3 ‒ chart 3

• Text under the figure must be part of the text.
• Figures should be streamlined "in text."
• The inscriptions in the figure should not be bold or sloping.
• All inscriptions in the figure must be written in one font and one size. The exception is screenshots of programs that do not allow one to edit the font.
• The indices in the figure should take the same form as the indices in the text.
• On the charts, the axes' titles must be moved from the scales to the same distance of at least 0.5 cm.
• At least one size (height or width) in the text under the figure should be the same. The horizontally located subfigures should have the same height, and the vertically located ones should have the same width.

• Figures must be of good quality (at least 300 dpi). The inscriptions on the figures should be clear and readable, the lines of the figure should not be blurred. There should be no noise in the figure. 
  (We kindly ask you not to use Microsoft Paint to create or edit your drawings. This program gives a maximum of 120 dpi, which does not meet the requirements of our journal)

• The editorial board reserves the right to reject a paper if the authors refuse to provide the original figure files to avoid data falsification (dwg ‒ for COMPAS drawings; SolidWorks, AutoCad, cdr. ‒ for CorelDRAW files; xls/xlsx ‒ for Excel, etc.).

• Header table does not contain blank cells
• If your document table is divided into several pages, re-do the signature on a new page does not need to!
• All tables should be vertical

• Formulas should be typed in the MathType equation editor
• Links to the formula in the text are (1), (2)–(4)
• Formulas should be numbered
• Numbering alignment to the right
• The formula is part of the text, so after a claim must stand semantic mark if the new proposal goes further, then the point, if further clarification is the comma

• References should take the form [1], [2, 3]
• References should be in the order of their mention in the article
• All literature references cited in the Literature part, reference should be in the text necessarily!

• References in a language articles, translated into English
• References must be completed according to the АРА standard
• Sources must be at least 10
• The list of references should be at least 6 on foreign sources
• The list of links inadmissible use national standards
• The percentage of self-citations - no more than 20 % (i.e., if you used the 10 links, only 2 of them can to your works)
• All sources must be unique (one source is mentioned only once in the bibliography)
• All sources must be provided in the original language (i.e. if an article/book, etc. was published in Ukrainian, sources should also be added to the list of references in Ukrainian, and not a translator or transliteration should be used)
• Before submitting the manuscript to the editor, it is necessary to check all URL sources for operability

• Full name
• Scientific degree
• Department
• University
• University address
• E-mail
• Contact phone
• Number of publications in Ukrainian editions (approximate)
• Number of publications in international journals indexed (approximate)
• H-index by Scopus (if available)
• Number of ORCID

The author's ORCID ID is required. ORCID provides a unique and persistent digital identifier that distinguishes researchers from every other researcher, even those who share the same name, and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between researchers and their professional activities, ensuring that their work is recognized.

Deadline 30–40 days

1. Once you submit your article, it will be sent for review. Our editorial staff is practicing a double-blind peer review

*Review procedure involves checking for plagiarism, verification of compliance the article title and content, check the content of the article (more detail).

2. Get response from reviewers. If adjustment is then necessary to take them into account, and return an e-mail tapr@entc.com.ua, tarp.nauka@gmail.com.
3. If there are no corrections or all the remarks made by the reviewers are corrected, the article will be accepted for publication in the journal based on the results of double-blind review.

Only those manuscripts that meet the standards of the journal, and fit within its aims and scope, will be sent to expert reviewers.

Deadline 3–14 days

1. Editing procedure involves checking articles on formal grounds, according to the correctness of the requirements.
2. Get the answer from the editors of the journal. If there are adjustments that need to take them into account and send the article back by email tapr@entc.com.ua, tarp.nauka@gmail.com.
3. If no adjustments or fixed all the comments made by the editor, you will need to prepare a package of documents.