Sat-Sun: Closed
+38 (057) 750-89-90
tapr@entc.com.ua
ISSN 2706-5448 (online)
Font – Times New Roman
Font size – 14
Interval – 1
Margins of the document – 20 мм
Minimum number of pages – 10
Article language: English
TITLE OF THE ARTICLE IN ENGLISH
First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name…. in English
TITLE OF THE ARTICLE IN UKRAINIAN (Translation for English-speaking authors in Ukrainian is made by editorial office)
First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name…. in Ukrainian
Abstract of the article (in minimum 250 words) in English suggests the following semantic units:
a brief author's interpretation of the results (an explanation what allow to achieve the effect).
Keywords in English (10–12 words)
Abstract in Ukrainian (in minimum 250 words)
Keywords in Ukrainian (10–12 words)(Translation for English-speaking authors in Ukrainian is made by editorial office)
«Introduction» section should provide the reader who does not own issues freely, with all the necessary background information to make it clear the relevance of scientific research.
«The object of research and its technological audit» section should contain a detailed description of the examined object.
At the end of this section you need to describe the specific disadvantages that are inherent in this object in the existing conditions of use/operation.
In «The aim and objectives of research» section on the basis of the identified disadvantages of the research object it is necessary to formulate the aim and objectives of the research, by which this objective can be achieved.
In this section, an analysis of existing ways of overcoming the disadvantages of the given object (a minimum of 10 sources) should be conducted. On the basis of this section, the reader (scientist, industrialist, manager) should form an idea of the existing operational experience / operation / maintenance, and so on of the object and inherent experience of eliminating real disadvantages. The number of foreign scientific periodicals sources must be at least 70 % of all used sources. (Note: the names of the authors of the used sources in the text are not mentioned, links to their works is sufficient in the text).
«Methods of research» section should include a description of the methods, techniques, approaches, and so on, which were involved in research.
In «Research results» section authors should give authors the research results (using graphic and tabular material sufficient for an understanding) with an emphasis on what the result has been received (in quantitative or qualitative terms), or are expected in the implementation of the proposed ideas of the author. The result must be accompanied by the author's interpretation – the answer to the question of how the results can be explained.
In this section, you need to specify:
− Strengths – the positive effect of the research object on its internal factors (e. g. increase efficiency of equipment leads to increased productivity and economic use of the calculation of the parameter contributes to the reduction of cash costs).
− Weaknesses – the negative effect of the research object on its internal factors (e. g., high energy costs and the complexity of calculation).
− Opportunities – prospects for further research (for example, to explore possible solutions to the problem of high energy consumption and the possibility of economic calculation of the parameter estimates for other economic variables).
− Threats – a negative effect of external factors on the object of research (such as the presence of foreign analogue equipment with better parameters or changing laws regarding the economic sphere of domestic production).
In this section, the results must correspond to the objectives of the section «The aim and objectives of research». Appropriate solution must describe for each of the objectives in the course of research.
Conflict of interest
It is necessary to indicate the absence or presence of a conflict of interest. If there is a conflict of interest, it must be specified.
When there is no conflict of interest, it is necessary to specify the phrase:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this research, whether financial, personal, authorship or otherwise, that could affect the research and its results presented in this paper.
Acknowledgements (if any)
The purpose of this section is an opportunity to thank all the people who contributed to the research, but do not qualify for authorship.
This section is optional and is added at the request of the author.
References to the АРА standard.
Fig. 1. The title of the figure: a ‒ the name of the first subfigure; b ‒ the name of the second subfigure...
Fig. 1. Title: 1 ‒ chart 1; b ‒ chart 2; 3 ‒ chart 3
The author's ORCID ID is required. ORCID provides a unique and persistent digital identifier that distinguishes researchers from every other researcher, even those who share the same name, and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between researchers and their professional activities, ensuring that their work is recognized.
Deadline 30–40 days
*Review procedure involves checking for plagiarism, verification of compliance the article title and content, check the content of the article (more detail).
Only those manuscripts that meet the standards of the journal, and fit within its aims and scope, will be sent to expert reviewers.
Deadline 3–14 days